🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.